Work on a real priority.
Agree the problem, intended outcome and a practical action or experiment during the training. Establish what evidence will show progress.
Training is the start.
Application is where it counts.
Every course combines live learning, a practical application tool and a one-hour follow-up to review what happened when you put it to work.
Use your course-specific tool.
Use the Team working-agreement experiment log to record your starting point, actions, results, obstacles and supporting evidence while applying the learning at work.
Bring the evidence back.
Join a 60-minute live cohort follow-up, normally 30 days after training. Review results with your facilitator, work through obstacles and agree what to change next. A 7- or 15-day review can be agreed where it better fits the application.
Your practical tool
Team working-agreement experiment log — a course application workbook supplied to participants for recording implementation and review evidence.
Preview the questions worth asking before you act. The delivery workbook is provided with the course.
How application and follow-up work
The organisation provides time, relevant permissions and an owner for the agreed action. Participants capture evidence in the tool before the review. Agilinks brings facilitated reflection and focused advisory support to help interpret results and decide the next step.
One 60-minute remote follow-up per delivered cohort is included. Where a workshop already includes a one-hour follow-up, this is the same session. For the 12-week programme, the review follows programme completion and is additional to its 36 live hours. Package support allowances of eight or 16 hours remain separate; this review does not reduce them.
The review date and evidence-sharing arrangements are agreed before booking. Share approved summaries or anonymised examples; the workbook stays within your organisation unless you choose to share it. The tool is a working template, not a hosted tracking platform. Implementation is carried out by your team; technical delivery and ongoing consultancy are separately scoped. Results are reviewed honestly, including where an approach did not work.